The reviewers
Who's actually reading your code?
Not an anonymous marketplace. Not an AI with a human name. A deliberately small bench of senior engineers who ship and maintain production software for a living — each one someone we'd trust with our own codebase.
01 — where they work
Day jobs at companies you know.
The majority of our reviewers are senior engineers working full-time at large corporations — the people who review code for a living inside teams where a missed flaw costs real money. They review here on the side, on codebases like yours.
02 — anonymous, until it matters
No public profiles. On purpose.
Our reviewers choose to stay anonymous until they claim a review. Engineers at big companies can't always put their name on outside work — and anonymity has a second benefit: a reviewer with no public profile to polish has no reason to sugarcoat anything. The review is the reputation.
Once a reviewer claims your case, they're not anonymous to you: you see who is working on your code, you watch their task board move, you talk to them in threads on your own files, and you rate them 1–5 stars when they deliver.
03 — the bar to get in
Shipped for real
Years of production experience — systems with real users, real incidents, real consequences. Not tutorial portfolios.
Code-tested, not CV-screened
Every reviewer reviews a real codebase as part of vetting. We judge the review they write, the way you will.
Rated on every single job
Customers rate 1–5 stars after every delivery, Uber-style. The rating follows the reviewer — there's nowhere to hide a lazy review.
Paid only on delivery
Your money is held until the review is delivered. A reviewer who doesn't deliver doesn't get paid. Incentives point at quality.
Want to join the bench? We don't run open applications — we invite senior engineers we'd trust with our own code, and every invite goes through the same code-tested vetting.
Your code, their eyes.
Start with the free score, then have one of these people read your code line by line.